The United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, seems to be championing a single cause: Israel.
When Haley speaks about Israel, her language is not merely emotive nor tailored to fit the need of a specific occasion. Rather, her words are resolute, consistent and are matched by a clear plan of action.
Along with Haley, the rightwing Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu is moving fast to cultivate the unique opportunity of dismissing the United Nations, thus, any attempt at criticizing the Israeli occupation.
Unlike previous U.N. ambassadors who strongly backed Israel, Haley refrains from any coded language or any attempt, however poor, to appear balanced. Last March, she told a crowd of 18,000 supporters at the Israel lobby, AIPAC’s annual policy conference, that this is a new era for U.S.-Israel relations.
“I wear heels. It’s not for a fashion statement,” she told the crowd thrilled by her speech. “It’s because if I see something wrong, we’re going to kick ’em every single time.”
Trump’s new sheriff/ambassador, condemned, in retrospect, U.N. Security Council Resolution 2334, which strongly criticized Israel’s illegal settlements. While still in its final days in office, the Obama administration did not vote for the resolution — but did not veto it, either — thus setting a precedent that has not been witnessed in many years.
The U.S. abstention, according to Haley, was as if the “entire country felt a kick in the gut.”
What made Israel particularly angry over Obama’s last act at the U.N. was the fact that it violated a tradition that has extended for many years, most notably during the term of John Negroponte, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., during the George W. Bush’s first term in office.
What became known as the “Negroponte doctrine” was a declared U.S. policy — that Washington will oppose any resolution that criticizes Israel that does not also condemn Palestinians.
But Israel, not the Palestinians, is the occupying power which refuses to honor dozens of U.N. resolutions and various international treaties and laws. By making that decision and, indeed, following through to ensure its implementation, the U.S. managed to sideline the U.N. as an “irrelevant” institution.
Sidelining the U.N., then, also meant that the U.S. would have complete control over managing the Middle East, especially the situation in Palestine.
However, under President Trump, even the U.S.-led and self-tailored “peace process” has become obsolete.
This is the real moral— but also political— crisis of the Haley doctrine, for it goes beyond Negroponte’s silencing any criticism of Israel at the U.N. into removing the U.N. entirely — thus international law — from being a factor in resolving the conflict.
In a talk at the Geneva-based Human Rights Council — which is made up of 47 member countries — Haley declared that her country is “reviewing its participation” in the council altogether. She claimed that Israel is the “only country permanently on the body’s calendar”, an inaccurate statement that is often uttered by Israel with little basis in truth.
If Haley read the report on the 35th session of the Human Rights Council, she would have realized that the rights body discussed many issues pertaining to women’s rights and empowerment, forced marriages and human rights violations in many countries.
But considering that Israel recently “celebrated” 50 years of occupying Palestinians, Haley should not be surprised that Israel is also an item on the agenda.
In fact, any country that has occupied and oppressed another for so long should also remain an item on the international agenda. Following her speech in which she derided and threatened U.N. member states in Geneva, she went to Israel to further emphasize her country’s insistence to challenge the international community on behalf of Israel.
Along with the notorious hasbara expert, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, Haley toured the Israeli border with Gaza. She showed sympathy with supposedly besieged Israeli communities, while, on the other side, nearly 2 million Palestinians in Gaza have been trapped for more than a decade in a very small region, behind sealed shut borders. Speaking in Jerusalem on June 7, Haley took on the U.N. “bullies” who have “bullied” Israel for too long.
“I have never taken kindly to bullies,” she said. “The U.N. has bullied Israel for a very long time and we are not going to let that happen anymore. It is a new day for Israel in the United Nations.”
By agreeing to live in Israel’s pseudo-reality, where bullies complain of being bullied, the U.S. is moving further and further away from any international consensus on human rights and international law. This becomes more pronounced and dangerous when we consider the Trump administration’s decision to pull out from the Paris accords on global warming.
Trump argued that the decision was of benefit to American businesses. Even if one agrees with such an unsubstantiated assertion, Haley’s new doctrine on Israel and the U.N., by contrast, can hardly be of any benefit to the United States in either the short or long run. It simply degrades U.S. standing and leadership and even goes below the lowest standards of credibility practiced under previous administrations.
Worse still, inspired and empowered by Haley’s blank check, Israeli leaders are now moving forward to physically remove the U.N. from Israel’s occupation of Palestine. Two alarming developments have taken place on that front:
One took place early May when the culture and sport minister, Miri Regev, made a formal demand to the Israeli cabinet to shut down the U.N. headquarters in Jerusalem, to punish UNESCO for restating the international position on the status of Israel’s illegal occupation of East Jerusalem.
The second was earlier this month, when Prime Minister Netanyahu called on Haley to shut down UNRWA, the U.N. body responsible for the welfare of 5 million Palestinian refugees.
According to Netanyahu, UNRWA “perpetuates” refugee problems. However, the refugees’ problem is not UNRWA per se, but the fact that Israel refuses to honor U.N. resolution 194 pertaining to their return and compensation.
These developments, and more, are all outcomes of the Haley doctrine. Her arrival at the U.N. has ignited a U.S.-Israeli hate fest, not only targeting U.N. member states, but international law and everything that the United Nations has stood for over the decades.
The U.S. has supported Israel quite blindly at the U.N. throughout the years. Haley seems to adopt an entirely Israeli position with no regard whatsoever for her country’s allies or the possible repercussions of dismissing the only international body that still serves as a platform for international engagement and conflict resolution.
Haley seems to truly think of herself as the new sheriff in town, who will “kick ’em every single time”, before riddling the bullies with bullets and riding into the sunset, along with Netanyahu. However, with a huge leadership vacuum and no law to guide the international community in resolving a 70-year-old conflict, Haley’s cowboy tactics are likely to do much harm to an already bleeding region.
Since the Negroponte doctrine of 2002, thousands of Palestinians and hundreds of Israelis were killed in an occupation that seems to know no end. Further disengagement from international law will likely yield a greater toll and more suffering.
–Dr. Ramzy Baroud is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media consultant, an author of several books and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com.